[Medications when travelling with underlying inflammatory rheumatic disease]. / Medikamente auf Reisen mit entzündlich-rheumatischer Grunderkrankung.

Travelling poses particular challenges for patients with rheumatic diseases. This article provides specific guidance on how best to manage medication while away from home. Besides outlining advice on basic logistic issues, such as the transportation, importation and storage of drugs, the article concentrates on travelling while receiving immunosuppressive therapy and carrying narcotics. Especially when transporting narcotics, travel requires careful planning in advance in close collaboration with physicians on account of the strict and internationally diverse import restrictions on controlled substances. While travelling, all drugs should be kept in the original packaging, including the package insert and stored in carry-on luggage. A specific medical passport may be needed. Immunosuppressive and narcotic drugs require medical certificates issued by the prescribing physician, which may need to be certified by the responsible national agencies. Patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment who travel in or across multiple time zones should also be aware of how the medication impacts and interacts with circadian rhythms so as to optimize the anti-inflammatory effects of the drugs and to avoid unnecessary complications. Given the significant discrepancies in medical care and availability of medication worldwide, the article further stresses the importance of a comprehensive medical kit tailored to the patient's individual medicinal needs. Finally, as immunocompromised travellers are at increased risk of infections, advice is given on the use of anti-infective drugs and chemoprophylaxis for patients travelling to areas in which malaria is endemic as well as on their possible interactions with immunosuppressive treatment.

[SARS-CoV-2 & rheumatic disease : Consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A comparison of the recommendations for action of rheumatological societies and risk assessment of different antirheumatic treatments]. / SARS-CoV-2 & Rheuma : Konsequenzen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie für Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen. Ein Vergleich der Handlungsempfehlungen rheumatologischer Fachgesellschaften und Risikobewertung verschiedener antirheumatischer Therapien.

The recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) update, which update and expand the guidance on the management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in view of SARS-CoV­2 created at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, correspond in many points with the recommendations for action of the American (ACR) and European (EULAR) societies, but also differ in some points. Therefore, this article discusses the core recommendations of the DGRh update on the prevention of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19, the risk assessment for inflammatory rheumatic diseases and the use of antirheumatic treatments in the context and in comparison to the ACR and EULAR recommendations, and provides an overview of the risk assessment of individual antirheumatic drugs.

[Current guidance of the German Society of Rheumatology for the care of patients with rheumatic diseases during the SARS-CoV-2/Covid 19 pandemic]. / Aktuelle Handlungsempfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie für die Betreuung von Patienten mit rheumatischen Erkrankungen während der SARS-CoV­2/Covid 19-Pandemie.

In the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic there are many questions regarding the safe treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Many of these questions cannot yet be answered on an evidence-based basis and this does not make patient care easy. The German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) hopes that these initial recommendations will provide support for specific issues in the care of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in view of the current threat posed by SARS-CoV-2. In order to take advantage of the dynamic worldwide gain in knowledge for our patients, the recommendations will be updated regularly. The updated versions of the recommendations are deposited on the homepage of the DGRh.

[S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs]. / S2e-Leitlinie: Therapie der rheumatoiden Arthritis mit krankheitsmodifizierenden Medikamenten.

BACKGROUND: Medication-based strategies to treat rheumatoid arthritis are crucial in terms of outcome. They aim at preventing joint destruction, loss of function and disability by early and consistent inhibition of inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVE: Achieving consensus about evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in Germany. METHODS: Following a systematic literature research, a structured process among expert rheumatologists was used to reach consensus. RESULTS: The results of the consensus process can be summed up in 6 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. There are several new issues compared to the version of 2012, such as differentiated adjustments to the therapeutic regime according to time point and extent of treatment response, the therapeutic goal of achieving remission as assessed by means of the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) as well as the potential use of targeted synthetic DMARDs (JAK inhibitors) and suggestions for a deescalating in case of achieving a sustained remission. Methotrexate still plays the central role at the beginning of the treatment and as a combination partner in the further treatment course. When treatment response to methotrexate is inadequate, either switching to or combining with another conventional synthetic DMARD is an option in the absence of unfavourable prognostic factors. Otherwise biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs are recommended according to the algorithm. Rules for deescalating treatment with glucocorticoids and-where applicable-DMARDs give support for the management of patients who have reached a sustained remission. DISCUSSION: The new guidelines set up recommendations for RA treatment in accordance with the treat-to-target principle. Modern disease-modifying drugs, now including also JAK inhibitors, are available in an algorithm.

[Lupus nephritis]. / Lupusnephritis.

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common major organ manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and causes significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, all patients with SLE should be regularly screened for LN. While new onset glomerular hematuria or proteinuria are suggestive for LN, a kidney biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis and classification. The treatment of LN comprises strict blood pressure control and administration of hydroxychloroquine. Aggressive forms of LN require additional treatment with immunosuppressive induction therapy followed by a maintenance phase for several years. Given the high rate of disease recurrence, life-long follow-up control in specialized centers is necessary. Despite optimal care a significant proportion of patients still develop chronic kidney failure. Better disease activity markers as well as more potent and specific therapeutic agents are thus urgently needed.

[Off-label biologic therapy of ANCA-associated and non-ANCA-associated small-vessel vasculitis : Efficacy and safety analysis of a national registry (GRAID2)]. / Off-label-Biologikatherapie von ANCA-assoziierten und nicht-ANCA-assoziierten Kleingefäßvaskulitiden : Wirksamkeits- und Sicherheitsanalyse eines nationalen Registers (GRAID2).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of off-label biological therapies in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and non-ANCA-associated small-vessel vasculitis (nAAV) in clinical practice. METHODS: The German Registry in Autoimmune Diseases 2 (GRAID2) is a national, retrospective, non-interventional, multicentre observational study (August 2006 until December 2013) on patients with autoimmune diseases refractory to standard immunosuppressive therapy treated with off-label biologicals. RESULTS: Data from 64 patients (20.6% of all GRAID2 patients) were collected: 54 patients (84.4%) had ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and 10 patients (15.6%) had non-ANCA-associated small-vessel vasculitis (nAAV). Of the AAV patients, 96.3% were treated off-label with rituximab (RTX) and 3.7% with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)-inhibitors. Of patients with nAAV, 30% were treated with RTX, 60% with TNFα-inhibitors, and 10% with tocilizumab. The main reasons for off-label biological treatment in AAV patients were pulmonary, renal, or ear, nose, and throat involvement. These manifestations clearly improved in most patients after off-label biological therapy was initiated. Daily glucocorticoid dosage could be reduced. The off-label biological therapy was generally well tolerated. In AAV patients, 4.18 severe infections per 100 patient years were observed. There was one death in the nAAV group caused by fungal infection and ileus. A correlation between this fatality and RTX treatment was regarded as possible. CONCLUSION: Safety and efficacy of off-label RTX-treatment in AAV-patients could be assessed in the GRAID2 data. Results point to good efficacy and safety of RTX in this special patient cohort and support the approval of RTX for AAV induction therapy.

[Safety and efficacy of off-label use of biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases refractory to standard of care therapy : Data from a nationwide German registry (GRAID2)]. / Sicherheit und Wirksamkeitshinweise zum Off-label-Einsatz von Biologikatherapien nach Versagen konventioneller Therapien bei Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen : Ergebnisse eines nationalen Registers (GRAID2).

BACKGROUND: The German Registry of Autoimmune Diseases 2 (GRAID2) is a retrospective, non-interventional, multicenter registry study collecting data from patients with inflammatory, mainly rheumatic diseases refractory to standard of care therapy and treated with an off-label biologic therapy. The retrospective documentation comprised case history, diagnosis, course of disease (including safety and global efficacy). The objective was to evaluate the global clinical outcome and safety of off-label biologic therapy in clinical practice. RESULTS: Data from 311 patients with an overall observation period of 338.5 patient-years were collected. The mean patients age was 47.8 years with 56.9% females. The most frequently documented diagnoses comprised rejection prophylaxis/therapy after renal transplantation (NTX, 18.3%), ANCA-vasculitides (17.4%), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 10.3%), autoinflammatory fever syndromes (8.4%), autoimmune myositis (7.4%) and pemphigus (5.8%). Documented biologic therapies included rituximab (RTX, 70.1%), tocilizumab (TCZ, 9.3%), infliximab (IFX, 7.1%), anakinra (ANK, 5.5%), adalimumab (ADA, 3.5%), etanercept (ETA, 2.3%) and certolizumab (CTZ, 0.6%). After initiation of off-label biologic treatment, tolerability was assessed by the physicians as "very good"/"good" in 95.5%. Altogether, 275 adverse events were documented and of these, 104 were classified as serious adverse events and occurred in 62 patients. In 19 of these patients severe infections (30.6%) were documented, resulting in a rate of 5.6 severe infections per 100 patient years. A total of six deaths were documented, while five of these cases were rated as not related to the biologics treatment. Notably, the use of RTX in patients with small vessel vasculitides and of TCZ in patients with large vessel vasculitides prior to their approval support their relevance in clinical management of patients with severe diseases. CONCLUSION: The results of this registry together with data of GRAID1 provide evidence that use of off-label biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases refractory to conventional treatment did not result in any new safety signal already known for these compounds or subsequently shown by clinical trials in certain entities.

[Hepatitis E infections in rheumatology. A previously underestimated infectious disease?]. / Hepatitis-E-Infektion in der Rheumatologie. Eine bisher unterschätzte Infektionskrankheit?

BACKGROUND: The detection and estimation of hepatitis E have greatly changed in recent years. An increasing number of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections, which were acquired in Europe and knowledge on chronic hepatitis E in immunosuppressed patients, give this infectious disease a new significance in industrial nations in contrast to the previous assumption of merely being a tropical disease with an acute course. Rheumatology patients under immunosuppressive therapy generally have an increased risk of infections. DIAGNOSTICS: An HEV infection should always be taken into consideration for the differential diagnostics, particularly in cases of increased transaminase levels and/or diarrhea. In contrast to healthy individuals where the course of HEV infections is mostly innocuous, in immunocompromised patients isolated severe and also chronic courses have been described. Testing of these patients should initially also include PCR of HEV-RNA because serological markers are not always reliable. Therapy with ribavirin (cave: off-label) is a possible therapeutic option and should be considered in individual cases in cooperation with a hepatologist and/or specialist for infections. Whether a general screening for HEV before therapy with biologics is recommendable, cannot yet be conclusively assessed. Additionally, an HEV infection should be included in the differential diagnostics of unclear systemic diseases because the disease can have diverse extrahepatic manifestations. CONCLUSION: There are serological indications that hepatitis E can act as a trigger for autoimmune diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis and cryoglobulinemia but this phenomenon and the underlying pathological mechanisms need further clarification.

[Interleukin-6 inhibition as a potential therapeutic target in rheumatic diseases]. / Interleukin-6-Blockade als potenzielles therapeutisches Target bei entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankungen.

As a pro-inflammatory cytokine, the 21-kDa glycoprotein interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a crucial role in the initiation of acute inflammation, as well in the perpetuation of a chronic inflammatory immune response. Thus, IL-6 might be involved in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune diseases. So far, the IL-6-rezeptor-antibody tocilizumab (TCZ, RoActemtra®) is the only approved drug for the treatment of IL-6-mediated disease, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic juvenile idiopathic (sJIA) and polyarticular juvenile arthritis (pJiA), as well as Castleman's disease (in Japan only). In recent years, an emerging number of case reports and small uncontrolled case series have reported on the successful treatment of various other chronic inflammatory diseases, which has resulted in the idea of a broad therapeutic potential for IL-6 blockade. Numerous IL-6 targets are currently in phase II/III study programs for RA as well as for other indications. This review focuses on the development of tocilizumab and other IL-6 targets as a therapeutic option for various diseases in rheumatology.

[Phase IV non-interventional studies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologicals in Germany : real-life clinical practice data]. / Nichtinterventionelle Phase-IV-Studien zur Behandlung der rheumatoiden Arthritis mit Biologicals in Deutschland : Praxisbezogene klinische Daten.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the restrictive nature of randomised controlled trials (RCT), non-interventional studies (NIS) investigate the features of a therapy in daily clinical practice. The observational plan of NIS does not dictate a treatment strategy, but is based on the product label. Unlike RCT, NIS therefore have no actual inclusion and exclusion criteria, allowing the study of broad heterogeneous patient populations. METHODS: NIS carried out in Germany with support from the pharmaceutical industry and investigating the use of biologics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis were identified and their findings were compared with those from the RCT of the respective biologic. RESULTS: Analysis of the identified NIS revealed the following: (1) populations in NIS were on average more than twice as large as in RCT, (2) patient characteristics in NIS and RCT were different, (3) the effectiveness of biologics in NIS was comparable to the efficacy observed in RCT, and (4) NIS collected supplementary data, e.g. on usage and dosing in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: NIS represent an important tool for the assessment of daily clinical practice. Despite methodological drawbacks, NIS provide valuable data that contribute to a more complete picture of the value of treatment with biologics. The English version of this article is available at SpringerLink (under "Supplemental").

[Renal diseases in rheumatology]. / Renale Erkrankungen in der Rheumatologie.

Renal involvement and renal function disorders are commonplace in patients with rheumatic diseases and are often decisive for the prognosis. Typical nephrological complications in rheumatology are renal manifestations or delayed sequelae of the underlying disease in addition to drug-induced renal failure, e.g. by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The differentiation from other common causes of disturbed renal function (e.g. diabetes and hypertension) is important and often difficult in individual cases. Renal involvement can be clinically manifested in many different ways. The spectrum ranges from slight functional disorders with, for example discrete erythrocyturia/proteinuria and normal renal function up to rapidly progressive renal failure. The probability of renal damage also varies greatly between different underlying diseases. For example, renal involvement in rheumatoid arthritis is a rarity but in contrast relatively normal in systemic lupus erythematosus. In the course of the differential diagnostics urine sediment, protein values and sonography are still the most important factors and the indications for kidney biopsy should be generously applied. Early initiation of immunosuppression can substantially improve the renal prognosis of inflammatory systemic diseases.

[Capillaroscopy. An update]. / Kapillarmikroskopie. Ein Update.

This article reports relevant innovations 2 years after the publication of the German consensus on nomenclature and procedure of capillaroscopy in this journal. Standardization: certified training courses in capillaroscopy under the patronage of the Rheumatism Academy have reached over 300 rheumatologists nationwide. Trained investigators clearly show greater agreement on findings than untrained experts even with years of experience. Normal findings were detected using the published terminology in a large cohort. Scientific application: the number of publications on capillaroscopy has risen significantly, prospective studies of smaller cohorts and the comparison to other methods regarding systemic sclerosis, Raynaud's disease and also miscellaneous diseases. A large prospective multicenter European study on the capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index (CSURI) was conducted with German participation. The role as a screening tool has been confirmed by the majority of the studies. For systemic lupus erythematosus it is also increasingly being used in the diagnostic work-up as an additional investigation. Practical application: capillaroscopy has a solid and indispensable role in the diagnostic algorithm of Raynaud's disease and early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. Videocapillaroscopy and simple USB microscopes are increasingly being used besides traditional light microscopy.

[Renal emergencies in cases of collagenosis and vasculitis]. / Renale Notfälle bei Kollagenosen und Vaskulitiden.

Renal involvement or complications in systemic diseases occur frequently and crucially influence patient outcomes. In addition to functional renal failure caused by medications (especially nonsteroidal antirheumatic agents), typical nephrological complications in rheumatology include manifestations of the underlying condition which range from mild disorders of renal function to severe and partially irreversible disease progression. The primary physician thus plays a key role in ensuring rapid and specific diagnostic workup and initiating appropriate treatment measures. Sonography and examination of urine sediment still take priority in the differential diagnosis. The indication for kidney biopsy should be broadly defined. Early initiation of immunosuppression in systemic diseases can decisively improve renal prognosis. Despite the current availability of considerably improved pharmacological options, numerous questions about the ideal therapeutic regimen still remain open.

Effectiveness and safety of the interleukin 6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab after 4 and 24 weeks in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the first phase IIIb real-life study (TAMARA).

OBJECTIVES: To confirm the effectiveness and safety of the interleukin 6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a setting close to real-life medical care in Germany. METHODS: A multicentre open-label phase IIIb study was undertaken. Patients with active RA with a 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) >3.2 despite previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were treated with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving LDAS ≤3.2 at week 24; secondary end points included American College of Rheumatology (ACR), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) responses and decrease in acute phase. Analyses in subgroups such as rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive versus RF-negative patients and patients with an inadequate response to treatment with DMARDs (DMARD-IR) versus those with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (TNF antagonist-IR) were performed. Safety was assessed by adverse event documentation. RESULTS: 286 patients were treated and 83.6% completed the study. 41.6% had previously been treated with TNF antagonists. 57% of the intention-to-treat patients achieved the primary end point of LDAS, 47.6% achieved DAS remission <2.6 and a EULAR 'good response' was achieved by 54.9%; ACR50/70 response rates at week 24 were 50.7% and 33.9%, respectively. The mean±SD decrease in CDAI from baseline to week 24 was 71±29%. C reactive protein levels normalised rapidly within 1 week. Major improvements in fatigue, pain and morning stiffness were observed in the first 4 weeks and further improved until week 24. DAS28, EULAR and ACR responses at week 24 did not differ between RF-positive and RF-negative patients. TNF antagonist-naive patients responded better than patients who had previously failed on TNF antagonists. The safety profile of tocilizumab was comparable to that previously observed in the phase III trial programme. Serious infections were observed in 3.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab is highly effective in a setting close to real-life medical care with a rapid and sustained improvement in signs and symptoms of RA. A manageable safety profile was seen over the 24-week study period.

[Novel approach for the early detection of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in the population using a mobile screening unit]. / Neuer Ansatz zur Früherkennung entzündlich-rheumatischer Erkrankungen in der Bevölkerung : RheumaCheck in einer mobilen Screening-Einheit.

Current evidence-based guidelines for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) emphasize the need for early diagnosis and treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. However, these recommendations have not been implemented universally in Germany. This prompted the German Cooperative Rheumatology Group Rhine-Ruhr to devise a screening programme for inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) using a specially equipped bus, which was sent on a 5-week tour of a series on local towns. Visitors were asked to fill out a questionnaire (RheumaCheck) and to undergo a blood test for rheumatoid factor and anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies. In the case of positive test results or on request due to symptoms, visitors could undergo targeted examination on the bus by a rheumatologist. Of the 2691 people who visited the bus (73% females, average age 62 years), 1330 consulted the rheumatologist. IRD was suspected in 319 attendees and confirmed in 104 of 172 screening participants, who went on to attend a rheumatological practice. RA was diagnosed in a total of 54 cases (2.1% of all visitors).

[Capillaroscopy. Procedure and nomenclature]. / Kapillarmikroskopie. Durchführung und Nomenklatur.

Capillaroscopy has high diagnostic and prognostic value in autoimmune connective tissue diseases, in particular systemic sclerosis (SSc). Our working group has developed a consensus on nomenclature, technical equipment, procedure, and diagnostic interpretation of results. The following are required: binocular microscopes with at least 20-/50- and 160-/200-fold magnification and digital archiving. Documentation of defined findings is mandatory. The simultaneous occurrence of, e.g. caliber variations, ectasia, ramifications, elongation (length > 350 microm), torsion (at least two crossing segments per capillary loop), sludge, hemorrhage, and edema is of pathological significance. The isolated occurrence of bushy capillaries (multiple ramifications), thrombosis, giant capillary (capillary lumen > 50 microm), and avascular areas also indicates disease. The latter two findings are highly specific for SSc. Other findings are consistent with connective tissue diseases. These standardized definitions increase quality and comparability of nailfold capillaroscopy in Germany.

Expression of CD57 on CD8+ T lymphocytes of patients with Wegener's granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis: evidence for continuous activation of CD8+ cells.

OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into the immune pathogenesis of Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), the prevalence of circulating CD8+ T lymphocytes expressing CD57 as a marker for previous activation was analyzed. METHODS: Receptor expression of CD57 was measured in CD8+ T cells of patients with active disease (n=5) by cytofluorometry and compared with expression in patients in remission (n=80) and in age-matched healthy donors (n=34). The results were compared to clinical parameters including severity and duration of the disease. RESULTS: CD8+CD57+ were detected in patients with WG and MPA and in healthy donors as well and increased considerably with age. Compared to age-matched healthy donors, the prevalence of CD8+CD57+ was increased in the younger patients (up to 40 y). In most patients a high percentage of CD8+CD57+ coincided with severe disease and multiple organ involvement, while low CD8+CD57+ percentage was seen in patients with limited disease or in patients in complete remission. In patients with smoldering disease, the percentage of CD8+CD57+ increased with time. High numbers of CD8+CD57+ correlated with low CD4:CD8 ratio. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with WG and MPA a population of CD8+CD57+ expand, identifying terminally differentiated CD8+ cells. The prevalence of CD57+ cells was related to the course of disease. So far, the function of CD57 on CD8+ cells is not understood. However, these cells might produce certain cytokines, which play a role in the pathogenesis of AAV. The data support the hypothesis that CD8+ T cells are activated in the context of primary vasculitides.